dammit dammit

[shadesong]

My arms are sore. My legs are sore. My back is gonna kill me tonight. People want me to do stuff that I cannot do, as the stuff I need to do that stuff is packed because hello, we're moving! And everything must be packed by Friday! And I'm sick of dealing with the student workers, both of whom are complete idjits that need everything explained to them six times today, especially Malek, who Will. Not. Shut. Up. And my boss is hideously neurotic about everything today, so I have to reassure her and do her bidding in the midst of everything else.

I need an iced chai and dark chocolate and, um, 'bout five orgasms. That would maybe make me feel better.

*dives back into the fray*

Comments

[olliesmama.livejournal.com]

I give damn good massages...wish I could help.

[shadesong.livejournal.com]

Me too! *hugs*

[melintur.livejournal.com]

Jeeze. I'd settle for just one.

[shadesong.livejournal.com]

One is never enough. One just starts to take the edge off.

Seriously. If I don't get at least three, the partner is not invited back. :)

[mfree.livejournal.com]

A demanding goal :) Lovely

[shadesong.livejournal.com]

Not especially - I'm very hair-trigger.

Seems fair

[songwind.livejournal.com]

I try to make sure we make it to at least three during the foreplay.

Re: Seems fair

[shadesong.livejournal.com]

See, that's ideal. If I've had three during foreplay, I can usually hit #4 just from the basic act of penetration, and then there's even *more* fun to be had...

[terracinque.livejournal.com]

On behalf of myself and all men, and most women everywhere, I hate you.

Re: Seems fair

[songwind.livejournal.com]

Exactly. And, being confined in male biology as I am, while I get one *really* fun moment at the end, between points A and B the most fun is in seeing exactly how high you can turn up the pleasure for your partner. IMO of course.

[amberfox.livejournal.com]

Ok, now I'm intimidated.... *curls up into a little ball and hides under the couch cushions*

I can't imagine three in a row, much less three in a night. But then, I'm difficult. =/

Good luck with it, though. ^_^

[mfree.livejournal.com]

oh hell, I've done 5 in a night, and that's without benefit of another person...

*TMI alarm is ringing* uh-oh....

[shadesong.livejournal.com]

My record is 27 in one night. But that's with three people (one girl, two guys) devoting themselves utterly to bringing me to orgasm as many times as possible, just to see how many I could have.

Re:

[amberfox.livejournal.com]

*pout* Now I'm feeling deprived.

AHA! Now I know what the problem is: other people are hogging more than their fare share of the available orgasms! *That's* why I'm not getting any! Hmm... I must find these people, and punish them.....

[shadesong.livejournal.com]

Nonono, don't be intimidated! I'm easy. I'm *all* kinds of easy.

[morenasangre.livejournal.com]

not as easy in some ways as a certain unnamed gentleman who whispered numbers in your ear in a car-confession that I was there for....

Re:

[amberfox.livejournal.com]

Hmm... That sounds interesting. ^_^

[auryn29a.livejournal.com]

So can you reach orgasm just by having your nipples played with? I had a friend like that. That was fun.

just noticed:

[songwind.livejournal.com]

My arms are sore. My legs are sore. My back is gonna kill me tonight.

You know, the beginning of your post seems like the sort of thing that'd come AFTER and in depth discussion of orgasms. :)

Re: just noticed:

[shadesong.livejournal.com]

Hee! Nah, less-fun physical labor.

sixty responses?

[metaphorge.livejournal.com]

My, aren't WE popular? ;P

Re: sixty responses?

[shadesong.livejournal.com]

Orgasm appears to be the magic word... :)

[stronae.livejournal.com]

Yeah, I tried 'lesbian' and I couldn't peak 20 responses. D'oh.

[deza.livejournal.com]

Maybe you should combine the two?

[stronae.livejournal.com]

Well, given this 'research' of finding out how to get lots of comments so far, it would seem that I'd have to. ;)