I am being sent some pretty clear messages.
a. I should not be getting into D/s, because whenever I get close to having the potential to do so, something goes Horribly Wrong.
b. I need to get back into practice, spiritually. First
iroshi, now
elorie and
mightywombat, all in my life and potentially working with me... okay already! I hear you!
So fine. I'm listening. :)
a. I should not be getting into D/s, because whenever I get close to having the potential to do so, something goes Horribly Wrong.
b. I need to get back into practice, spiritually. First
So fine. I'm listening. :)
no subject
Is that a decision not to pursue the D/s stuff any more, or just an acknowledgement of receipt of message?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
*chuckles*
no subject
•
no subject
no subject
(and getting back to spirit is never a bad thing ;p)
p.s. - I'm open for weird pagany stuff too. ;)
no subject
Good... you are aware of the fact that I live for WeirdPaganyShit, yes?
no subject
no subject
no subject
B) Good
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Or did you have to experience and learn as everyone else did?
no subject
Heh. No.
0
Re:
no subject
I would suggest you learn more about the person you're speaking with before making comments that require assumptions, really, in general...
Re:
Is ANYONE to give up ANYTHING simply because of a 'bad event on the first try' ?
If that was the case, then by your own words of her first relationship, she would never have had another relationship ever, in any form.
And I doubt many of us would have had sex past the first time.
I stated the truth. Judging something soley by your 'first experience' is not a way to make a decision.
You obviously either misunderstood or misread my comment.
Re:
Actually, no, it didn't. Read again. It said, "whenever I get close to having the potential to do so, something goes Horribly Wrong." That implies multiple instances, which is, in fact, the case.
I stated the truth. Judging something soley by your 'first experience' is not a way to make a decision.
You obviously either misunderstood or misread my comment.
Umm. Well, that would have been a good statement to make. If you had, in fact, made it. You didn't. It would have made your point, based on incorrect data as it was, much *clearer*, if no more accurate.
Again, I come away with the clear impression that you really don't know 'song very well, and politely suggest that *advisory* commentary shouldn't be posted on a person's journal until you've read at least a little ways back in their journal and learned a bit about them.
no subject
Ah. No. There have been many many tries, all blowing up in my face, save one, which ended in 2000.
no subject
no subject